Battlestar And Abortion

Timothy Sandefur on Feb 18th 2006


A brilliantly written episode of Battlestar Galactica last night, and, as always, carried off with acting quality that made it completely believable. Some time ago, I complained that we weren’t seeing enough internal squabbling among the colonials, and now we’re really seeing it.

Is Roslin right to ban abortion, so as to ensure the propagation of the human species? I think the answer is no, although it’s entirely understandable and believable that she would feel that way. She takes her role as guardian of the race very seriously now, and particularly now that she has been convinced that she is the Chosen One of the scriptures. But there are three big reasons that Roslin is wrong.

First, she has simply issued a dictatorial decree in what is (I guess) a representative sort of democratic regime with notions of individual rights. If people have the right to strike, as we saw a few weeks ago, and if there’s freedom of the press, then the colonials have some notion of freedom; so surely there’s some limit to what the President can simply declare. How can she therefore simply decree that abortion shall not be allowed? It’s just the sort of impulsive, dictatorial, unilateral move that her critics have been complaining of—not to mention that it seems to confirm the charge that she’s too taken with the spiritual side of her mission to see herself as a secular leader.

Second, there is no reason to believe that the repopulation rate will continue at the level that Baltar claims. Population biology shows that repopulation rates change with the level of population itself, rather than continuing at some constant rate for generations. If the fleet starts experiencing too little child birth, chances are that the population rate would change as a result without government interference. Depopulation seems to me less likely a danger than genetic bottlenecking or the spread of disease, which haven’t been mentioned. In fact, the greatest danger to the fleet is not the Cylons, but disease spreading through the fleet.

And third, of course, Baltar is right that the difference between the humans and the Cylons is just that the humans are free, and this is a betrayal of those values. If humans choose not to repopulate themselves—which, again, I think unlikely—well, they have that right. Are we going to force people to have children, as in ancient Sparta? Assuming depopulation is a serious problem, there are so many better ways to encourage reproduction: offering extra rations for families, for example, or propaganda campaigns. Heck, if you’re going to get really serious about it, allow people to experiment with polygamy or other schemes. Banning abortion out of a concern for population growth seems like the most extreme move, with the least amount of political gain and the largest number of objections. It’s a serious mistake. Yet an understandable one, given the circumstances, which is what makes the episode so well written.

(You know, if only the mysterious, one-episode-only, “lifelong trusted advisor” Wallace Gray were still around…)

Meanwhile, Adama shows the one weakness of his character, promoting Lee to command the Pegasus. All the viewer could think was, “just like Zac….”

Filed in The Basement

6 Responses to “Battlestar And Abortion”

  1. [...] After watching last night’s Battlestar Galactica, one of my first thoughts was to wonder what Timothy Sandefur was going to write about it. He’s done a fascinating series of posts on the show, and I knew he’d have something to say about Roslin’s decision to ban abortion in the fleet. His commentary is now up, and from my perspective, he’s dead on. Read it. [...]

  2. Jacqueline Mackie Paisley Passeyon 18 Feb 2006 at 11:40 pm

    Battlestar Galactica and abortion (COMMENTS CONTAIN SPOILERS)

    I just wanted to call your attention to some other interesting posts (with spoilers, of course) on other blogs on last night’s episode: Battlestar And Abortion on Positive Liberty Turtlexheart writes about how she’s divided on last night’s Battlesta…

  3. thompsonian*NET blogon 19 Feb 2006 at 7:18 am

    Battlestar 217: a podcast deferred

    I’m so bummed. Ronald D. Moore, Executive Producer of the greatest program on television, Battlestar Galactica, says he was:
    travelling [sic] and couldn’t get the podcast on “Captain’s Hand” out in time for tonight’s…

  4. [...] Reader William Dunning writes, As big a fan as I have been of this show through the first season and the start of the second, lately it has been heading in a downhill direction, and the latest episode is no exception. In addition to the annoying sidetracks from the main story line, and all the fake interpersonal tension that hits you with the subtlety of a frying pan to the head, Moore has slumped even further this time with his cheap attempt to cash in on current controversial issues in order to attract viewers. Mr. Sandefur, you say that “the episode bears very little resemblance at all to our own controversies about abortion”; I disagree. Let me respond to some of your points. [...]

  5. Drowned at the Riveron 25 Feb 2006 at 6:34 pm

    When Art intersects Life…

    Cruising around the web seeking other BSG fans and commentary, I’ve once again crossed paths with the Positive Liberty site. I consider the authors at that site to be fellow travelers; that is, they are philisophical libertarians, people that b…

  6. Positive Liberty » Battlestar Bloggingon 28 Mar 2007 at 12:37 pm

    [...] I’ve been very delinquent in my Battlestar Galactica blogging of late. Part of this was because this season was in many ways a real let-down, and in more than one instance we saw the series’ attempts to make interesting statements collapse into banality and poorly thought-out themes, not unlike the awful season 2 episode “Black Market” that I blogged about here or the only slightly better sequence in which Roslin incredibly prohibits abortion as a population management measure. [...]

Trackback URI |